Betrayal, Part 4: The Return on Investment
OPINION & ANALYSIS · BETRAYAL: THE PLAN ALL ALONG (4 of 4)
In one October week, Trump licensed Russian diesel, waived the sanctions Congress passed, and Ukraine's drone crews had their satellite service capped. Whether he is Moscow's asset or its fool, America pays the same bill.
By Joseph J. Jackson, Founder of FMNN and author of The Death of the American Dream. Published October 18, 2026. Facts current as of October 17, 2026.
Disclosure: FMNN sells merchandise referencing Donald Trump. Our reporting follows the record regardless.
Speed limit
On Oct. 14, 2026, Ukrainian drone crews flying interceptors against Russian attack drones began losing their connection mid-flight. The military version of Starlink, called Starshield, had been capped at about 100 mph, and terminals were dropping out. Missions were disrupted. Ukraine's forces got no warning. [1][2]
When Ukraine's former defense minister asked Elon Musk what happened, Musk answered on X that Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the U.S. government, and any limits "are decided by the U.S. military and ultimately POTUS." [1] U.S. officials told Axios it was a technical malfunction, and the White House denied any role. The next day, Reuters reported that two U.S. officials and a Western official said people inside the White House told the Pentagon to impose the limits. A senior U.S. official told Bloomberg Trump did not personally order them. [3] Service largely returned by Oct. 15, but the speed cap reportedly stayed. [1]
Five days before the drone links failed, Trump had announced a deal to buy Russian diesel. Two days after, he waived the sanctions Congress had just passed to punish Russia. This series argues this is the week everything before it was building toward: the courtship, the payoff and the fight to hold power.
THE LEDGER
| Row | What the record shows | Label | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAID | Trump's Oct. 16 executive order says waiving the new Russia sanctions is "in the national interests of the United States." It gives no other public reason. | Documented, Tier 1 | Executive order, Oct. 16, 2026 [4] |
| DID | Waived the Graham Act's 500% tariffs on Russian goods, its 100% tariffs on top buyers of Russian oil, and most of its sanctions, two days before they took effect, with no end date. Licensed Russian diesel imports on Oct. 9. | Documented, Tier 2 | Executive order [4]; OFAC General License 135 [5] |
| RESULT | Russia keeps selling oil without the penalties Congress voted for, and gains a new licensed buyer for its diesel. Ukraine, pressed to stop striking Russian refineries, had its front-line Starshield service speed-capped, disrupting drone missions. | Documented, Tier 2 | [3][5][6] |
| GAP | Congress passed sanctions to cut off Putin's war money. The president turned them off and opened a new market for Russian fuel in the same week. | Documented | [4][5][7] |
| KNEW | A bipartisan group of 12 senators, six of them Republicans, wrote Trump on Oct. 13 that the diesel deal was "a gift to our adversary and a betrayal of our Allies." He waived the sanctions three days later. | Documented, Tier 1 | Senators' letter [7] |
| SAID AFTER | On Oct. 15, Trump called Ukraine's refinery strikes "a disgrace" and said Zelenskyy is "more difficult to deal with than Putin." | Documented, Tier 1 | AP/Reuters via Al Jazeera [8] |
The senators' letter is Tier 1: the president was warned in writing, by members of his own party, before he acted.
What you need to know
This part does three things. It lays out what Trump did for Russia in 2025 and 2026. It explains, in plain terms, what treason is and why the line between "treason" and "high crimes" is thinner than most people think. And it walks through where a court case would go, and why the answer is impeachment and removal, not a courtroom.
FMNN's position, stated once: whether Donald Trump is a Russian asset or Russia's useful fool, the result for the United States and its allies is the same. That is opinion, built on the record below. So is the series title. "The plan all along" is our argument about where 40 years of conduct leads, not a claim that a document proves Russian direction. No released record does.
The diesel deal
On Oct. 9, after a call with Vladimir Putin, Trump announced Russia would supply more than 300,000 tons of diesel right away, 500,000 tons in November, and more after that, up to about 4.8 million tons in all. That is roughly nine days of U.S. diesel demand. [5]
The same day, the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control issued General License 135, authorizing deals in Russian-origin diesel, including imports into the United States. It runs through April 7, 2027. [5]
According to Axios, a U.S. official said Trump made the deal after Zelenskyy ignored about six U.S. requests to stop striking Russian oil refineries. Zelenskyy called the deal "not fair and not honest." A Ukrainian official alleged that U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner threatened to cut off intelligence sharing over the strikes. The U.S. official denied it. [6]
Read what that means. Ukraine was hitting the refineries that fuel Russia's army. The United States asked it to stop, then bought the refineries' product.
The sanctions Congress passed
On Sept. 18, 2026, Trump signed the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, named for the late senator. It authorized tariffs of up to 500% on Russian goods and up to 100% on the largest buyers of Russian oil and gas and the biggest facilitators of sanctions evasion. [4][9]
On Oct. 16, Trump signed an executive order that set those tariffs at the full 500% and 100%, then, in the same order, waived them two days before they were set to start on Oct. 18. It also waived most of the law's sanctions. The waiver has no end date. It lasts until the president or the secretary of state says otherwise. Its only public reason is the national interest. The detailed reasoning went to Congress in a report that has not been made public. [4][10]
The day before, Treasury extended a license letting Russian oil giant Lukoil keep its foreign gas stations and service operations running until April 2027. [11]
The satellite link
The Starshield slowdown hit Ukraine's interceptor drones, the cheap aircraft it uses to knock down Russia's Shahed attack drones before they hit apartment buildings. [1][2] It came the same week, AP reported, that Ukraine's air defenses got no warning of Russian ballistic missiles that struck Kyiv. A Ukrainian official said bad weather may explain the missing warning. Zelenskyy told NPR the United States had warned it could stop sharing ballistic-missile intelligence unless the refinery strikes ended. Trump said, "We are helping them, and we are sharing intel." [12]
The record does not settle who ordered the Starshield limits. Reuters' sources point to the White House. U.S. officials called it a malfunction, the White House denied any role, and a senior official said Trump did not personally order it. [3] What the record does settle is the sequence: pressure on Ukraine to stop hitting Russian fuel, a deal to buy Russian fuel, a cap on Ukraine's battlefield link, and a waiver of Russian sanctions, in eight days.
This isn't the first time. In March 2025, after a shouting match with Zelenskyy in the Oval Office, the administration paused intelligence sharing with Ukraine. CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirmed it. [13]
Turning on the allies
Trump's 1987 newspaper ad, from Part 1, said America's allies were taking advantage of it. In his second term, he has acted on it.
At the United Nations. On Feb. 24, 2025, the third anniversary of Russia's full invasion, the United States voted against a General Assembly resolution backing Ukraine. It voted alongside Russia and North Korea. [14] As of February 2026, the United States had paid about $160 million of nearly $4 billion it owed the U.N. for its regular budget and peacekeeping, and it accounted for about 95% of all unpaid regular-budget dues. In January 2026 it quit 31 U.N. programs. [15] Under Article 17 of the U.N. Charter, those dues are a legal obligation. [16]
South Korea. The 1953 Mutual Defense Treaty commits both countries to meet an armed attack on the other. [17] In January 2026, Trump raised tariffs on South Korea to 25%. On Aug. 16, he posted on Truth Social that he had ordered Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to "substantially reduce" the joint Ulchi Freedom Shield military exercises. He called the drills costly and a "totally inappropriate and hostile" signal to North Korea's Kim Jong Un, whom he praised as "unthreatening and respectful." He also cited Seoul's refusal to join him on Iran, though he later called that "somewhat unrelated." [18][45]
The next day, at the White House, he told reporters the United States has soldiers in South Korea "guarding you from Kim Jong-un, your next-door neighbor." Then he asked: "Well, why are we involved in helping you?" [46] South Korea's Joint Chiefs said the allies agreed to end the drills six days early and scale back some field training. [18] In October, he said South Korea "has to pay the price" for lower tariffs. [19]
Read those days together. The president cut back the drills that prepare U.S. and South Korean troops to fight North Korea because they might offend Kim, then questioned why America protects South Korea from Kim at all. On Sept. 29 he called Kim "a friend" and said, "as long as I'm around, he's going to be fine." [47] He has not said in words that he would abandon a treaty ally. His record says it for him.
NATO. In January 2026, Trump suggested "testing" Article 5, NATO's mutual-defense pledge, by asking allies to help at the U.S. southern border. [20] On April 1, after allies declined to help in the Strait of Hormuz, he said he was strongly considering leaving NATO and called it a "paper tiger." [21] In August he told Axios he was "not concerned... at all" about Russia attacking a NATO country. [22]
Every one of these moves is something Moscow has wanted for 70 years: an America that votes with Russia, stops paying for the world body, shakes its Pacific alliance and tells Europe it is on its own.
Asset or fool
There are two explanations for this record. Neither helps him.
The first is that Russia has leverage over Trump, through money, compromising material, or the debts of a man who chased Moscow deals for decades. The pieces in Parts 1 and 2 point that way: the tower talks, the Russian condo money, the Kremlin email, the polling data, the private meetings with no notes. But no released document proves Russian control, and FMNN does not claim it as fact.
The second is that Trump admires Putin, believes his account of the world, and wants a deal with him for its own sake. That is consistent with everything Trump has said in public.
Here is our point. The difference between those two explanations matters to a prosecutor. It does not matter to a Ukrainian drone pilot whose screen goes dark. It does not matter to a South Korean soldier watching drills get cut, or to the Americans whose elections Russia attacked. An asset and a willing fool deliver the same goods.
Treason, and why the line is so thin
What the Constitution says
Treason is the only crime the Constitution defines. Article III, Section 3 says it consists only of "levying War against" the United States, or "adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." A conviction needs two witnesses to the same overt act, or a confession in open court. [23] The federal statute, 18 U.S.C. 2381, carries a penalty of death or at least five years in prison, and bars the person from ever holding federal office. [24]
The Framers wrote it narrowly on purpose. English kings had used vague treason laws to kill their critics.
The enemy problem
"Enemies" has a specific legal meaning: a nation in a declared war, or open war, with the United States. Every treason conviction the Supreme Court has upheld came from a declared war. In Haupt (1947), a father sheltered his son, a Nazi saboteur. In Kawakita (1952), a dual citizen abused American prisoners of war in Japan. [23][25]
Russia is not a legal "enemy." Congress has not declared war, and U.S. and Russian forces are not fighting each other. Law professor Carlton Larson, the leading scholar on American treason law, has said that even conspiring with Russia to undermine a U.S. election would not be treason under this test. [26] Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were convicted of conspiring to pass atomic secrets to the Soviet Union in the 1940s. They were executed in 1953 for espionage, not treason, because the Soviet Union was not an enemy in the legal sense. [23]
So FMNN does not say Trump is guilty of treason. That would be false, and the record doesn't need it.
The switch
Now imagine Russia were at war with the United States. Here is the same conduct, judged twice. The right-hand column is a hypothetical, not a charge.
| Act | Today | Hypothetical: if Russia were at war with the U.S. |
|---|---|---|
| Waiving sanctions Congress passed to cut Russia's war revenue | A legal use of a waiver the law allows | An overt act that strengthens the enemy's war funding |
| Licensing the purchase of Russian diesel | A Treasury license | Trading with the enemy, funding its economy |
| Pressing an ally to stop striking the enemy's refineries | Diplomacy | Shielding the enemy's fuel supply |
| Cutting an ally's battlefield satellite service or intelligence | A policy choice, if ordered | Weakening forces fighting the enemy |
| Sharing an ally's classified intelligence with the enemy's diplomats (reported by The Washington Post, May 2017) | Lawful: within a president's power to declassify | Handing secrets to the enemy |
| Voting with the enemy at the U.N. | Diplomacy | Public aid and comfort |
In Haupt, the Supreme Court said ordinary acts become treason when they help the enemy's design: giving a man a car, a bed, a job. [25] Every act in that table is bigger than a borrowed car.
This is how small the difference is. The act is identical in both columns. The harm to Ukraine is identical. The money reaching the Kremlin is identical. The only thing that changes is a vote in Congress declaring war. The label moves from what we argue are high crimes to treason. The damage does not move at all.
Even in wartime, a prosecutor would face two more hurdles. Cramer v. United States (1945) requires proof of intent to betray, not just help: "if there is no intent to betray, there is no treason." [27] And the two-witness rule means documents alone don't convict. A president's defense would be that every act was a foreign policy judgment. That is the asset-or-fool question again, and in wartime it would decide whether he went to prison.
The 14th Amendment uses the same words. Section 3 bars from office anyone who took an oath and then gave "aid or comfort" to the nation's enemies. [28] The Framers of both texts drew the line at war. They did not imagine a president whose conduct, in our view, helps a hostile power in peacetime, from the Oval Office.
What the charges could be
Short of treason, here are the federal crimes that come closest to the conduct in this series, and the problem with each.
- Conspiracy to defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. 371). Agreeing to obstruct a lawful government function by dishonest means. Mueller used it against the Russians who attacked 2016. Smith used it against Trump over 2020. [29] It is the strongest fit, and it has already been charged once.
- Acting as an agent of a foreign government without notice (18 U.S.C. 951) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act. These require proof that someone acted under a foreign government's direction or control. [30] No public evidence shows that about Trump. This is where "asset" would have to be proven, not argued.
- Obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. 1512). The ten Mueller episodes from Part 2. More than 1,000 former prosecutors said they would support charges. [31] But most of that conduct dates to 2017 and 2018. The usual limit for federal charges is five years. Whether the clock paused while he was president is an unsettled question. [32]
- Mishandling national defense information (18 U.S.C. 793). Charged in the classified documents case, which Judge Cannon dismissed. [33]
- Bribery (18 U.S.C. 201). Requires proof of something of value in exchange for an official act. No such exchange with Russia is public. [32]
- The Foreign Emoluments Clause. Bars officials from taking payments from foreign states without Congress's consent. It is enforced through impeachment, not prosecution. [32]
Where a court case would go
Suppose a prosecutor wanted to charge Trump over his Russia policy. Here is the road.
- Wait. Justice Department legal opinions from 1973 and 2000 say a sitting president cannot be indicted. [34] Nothing happens before Jan. 20, 2029.
- Indict on what's left. The Supreme Court's 2024 immunity ruling gives presidents absolute immunity for core powers, like diplomacy and dealing with foreign governments, and presumed immunity for all other official acts. Waiving sanctions, licensing diesel, setting intelligence policy and directing the military all sit in that zone. [35]
- Lose the evidence. The same ruling bars prosecutors from using immune official acts as evidence, even to prove a charge about private conduct. [35] The sanctions waiver could not be shown to the jury.
- Fight for years. A denied immunity claim can be appealed before trial, all the way to the Supreme Court. The Jan. 6 case spent most of the first half of 2024 on that appeal. [35]
- Charge only private conduct. What remains is what Trump did as a businessman or candidate: the Moscow tower, campaign contacts, private money. Most of that is now outside the statute of limitations.
The result: a court case over this conduct would very likely fail before a jury ever heard it. That is not because the conduct is innocent. It is because the Supreme Court decided presidents get room to make foreign policy, even disastrous foreign policy, without facing a criminal court.
That is why removal is the answer. The Constitution never meant prosecutors to be the check on a president's foreign policy. It meant Congress.
Why removal
Article II, Section 4 says the president "shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." [36] High crimes do not have to be statutory crimes. In Federalist No. 65, Alexander Hamilton wrote that impeachable offenses come from "the abuse or violation of some public trust," injuries done to society itself. [37] At the Constitutional Convention, the delegates who argued for an impeachment power worried openly that a president might betray the country to a foreign power. [38]
Consider a president who waives the sanctions Congress passed to defund a war on America's partners. He licenses the attacker's fuel. He leaves treaty allies wondering whether the United States will keep its word. That is the abuse of a public trust. No court has to agree for Congress to act.
Removal is hard by design. The House impeaches by majority. The Senate convicts with two-thirds, 67 votes. The most Trump has ever faced is 57. [39] After conviction, a simple majority can bar him from future office. [36]
The 25th Amendment lets the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet declare a president unable to serve. It has never been used that way, and it was written for incapacity, not misconduct. [40]
Congress has other tools. It passed a law in December 2023 barring any president from leaving NATO without two-thirds of the Senate or an act of Congress. [41] It controls the money for the Pentagon, the U.N. and Ukraine. It can hold hearings on who ordered the Starshield limits. Those tools work only if Congress uses them.
Every House seat and a third of the Senate are on the ballot Nov. 3. In Florida, early voting starts as early as Oct. 19 in some counties and statewide by Oct. 24. Check your county. The check the Founders built runs through Congress, and Congress runs through the voters.
Reality of the Situation
The White House did not respond to a request for comment sent Oct. 17, 2026, with a 4 p.m. ET deadline. FMNN will add any response it receives.
What his defenders say: Trump is a peacemaker trying to end a war. He was tough on Russia: he sanctioned Rosneft and Lukoil. The diesel deal lowers fuel prices for Americans. Allies have been freeloading for decades. Starlink was a glitch. The whole Russia story is a hoax.
What the record says:
- "He sanctioned Russia's oil giants." True, and FMNN gives him credit. In October 2025, after a planned Budapest summit with Putin collapsed, his administration sanctioned Rosneft and Lukoil. [42] A year later, he extended Lukoil's license to keep operating abroad and waived the Graham Act's tariffs and sanctions. [4][11] The record shows one tough step, then a year of retreat.
- "The diesel deal lowers prices." Diesel had already fallen from a record $6.53 a gallon to $6.20 before the deal. The deal covers about nine days of U.S. demand. [5] Whatever it saves at the pump, the money goes to Russian sellers while Russia is at war with a U.S. partner.
- "He's a peacemaker." The pressure in this record ran one way. Ukraine was told to stop hitting refineries. Russia was given a diesel buyer and a sanctions waiver. Putin told Trump on Oct. 9 that talks were unlikely to resume soon. [43]
- "Starlink was a technical malfunction." Disputed. Reuters' sources say the White House told the Pentagon to impose the limits. The White House denies any role, and a senior official says Trump did not personally order it. [3] The record does not settle this yet, and FMNN will update when it does.
- "Allies freeload." Treaty commitments are not favors. They are law the Senate ratified: NATO Article 5, the U.S.-South Korea treaty, the U.N. Charter. [16][17][44] South Korea is paying for U.S. forces and investing $150 billion in American shipbuilding, which Trump himself cited this month. [19]
- "It's all a hoax." The Russian attack on 2016, the campaign's contacts, the Moscow tower and the polling data come from Mueller, a Republican-led Senate committee and the Treasury Department, not the dossier. (See Parts 1 and 2.)
Voices of Resistance
On Oct. 13, 12 senators signed a letter to the president, six Republicans and six Democrats. The Republicans were Thom Tillis, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitch McConnell, John Cornyn and Alan Armstrong of Oklahoma. They called the diesel deal a betrayal of America's allies and asked him to enforce the sanctions they had passed. [7] Breaking with a president of your own party a month before a midterm election costs something. Three days later he waived the sanctions anyway.
Reading the Pattern
Reform, then rollback. Congress passed the strongest Russia sanctions in years in September. The president switched them off in October, two days before they took effect.
The official story. "In the national interests of the United States" is the only public reason given for waiving sanctions on the country waging war on a U.S. partner.
Accountability delayed and partial. Mueller could not charge a president. Smith's case died with an election. The immunity ruling now shields the conduct in this part. What remains is Congress.
Who Carried the Story
Axios reported the diesel deal's link to the refinery strikes. Reuters broke the claim that the Starshield order came from the White House. The Kyiv Independent and Ukrainska Pravda reported the front-line effects first. The senators' letter was published on Sen. Richard Blumenthal's Senate website. The executive order waiving the Graham Act was posted on WhiteHouse.gov late on a Friday.
Closing
In September 1987, after his first trip to Moscow, Donald Trump paid for a newspaper ad complaining that America protected "ships we don't own, carrying oil we don't need."
In October 2026, the ships carrying Russian diesel have an American license. The allies who own their own ships are being told to pay up or fend for themselves. And the drone crews fighting Russia had their link to the sky slowed down from Washington's side of the line.
Call it treason, call it high crimes, call it the act of a fool. The ships still sail.
Sources
- Jimmy Rushton, "No one's owning up to crippling Ukraine's military Starlink," Kyiv Independent, Oct. 15, 2026 — kyivindependent.com
- Michael B. Kelley, Yahoo Finance (citing The Wall Street Journal), Oct. 14, 2026 — finance.yahoo.com
- Siladitya Ray, Forbes (citing Reuters and Bloomberg), Oct. 16, 2026 — forbes.com
- The White House, Executive Order, "Implementing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026," Oct. 16, 2026, Secs. 2 and 4 — whitehouse.gov
- Lars Hanson, KTUU Alaska's News Source, Oct. 14, 2026 (diesel volumes, General License 135, prices) — alaskasnewssource.com; U.S. Treasury OFAC, Russia-related General License 135.
- Barak Ravid, Axios, Oct. 10, 2026 — axios.com; Kyiv Post, Oct. 10, 2026 — kyivpost.com
- Sen. Richard Blumenthal, "Bipartisan Senators Call on Trump to Rescind Russian Diesel Deal…," Oct. 13, 2026 — blumenthal.senate.gov
- Al Jazeera (AP/Reuters), "Russia says Ukraine resumes attacks on oil refineries," Oct. 15, 2026 — aljazeera.com
- Will Weissert and Meg Kinnard, AP, "Trump puts new Russia sanctions passed by Congress on hold," Oct. 16, 2026 — abcnews.com
- Bridget Luckey, Law Commentary, Oct. 16, 2026 — lawcommentary.com
- Kyle Fitzgerald, The National, Oct. 15, 2026 — thenationalnews.com
- AP via The Boston Globe, Oct. 13, 2026 — bostonglobe.com; Eastern Herald (citing NPR and CBS), Oct. 13, 2026 — easternherald.com
- Chris Rickleton, RFE/RL, Mar. 5, 2025 — globalsecurity.org
- Adla Massoud, The National, Feb. 24, 2025 — thenationalnews.com
- AP via Al Jazeera, "US pays about $160m towards nearly $4bn in UN dues," Feb. 20, 2026 — aljazeera.com
- Charter of the United Nations, Arts. 17 and 19 — un.org
- Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of Korea (1953), Art. III — avalon.law.yale.edu
- John Power, Al Jazeera, Jan. 27, 2026 — aljazeera.com; Al Jazeera, Aug. 17, 2026 — aljazeera.com
- Yoon Kyung-hwan, Seoul Economic Daily, Oct. 7, 2026 — sedaily.com
- Chad de Guzman, TIME, Jan. 2026 — time.com
- The Telegraph, Apr. 1, 2026 (Trump interview on NATO); Arab News (Reuters), Apr. 2026 — arabnews.com
- Axios, Aug. 27, 2026 — axios.com
- U.S. Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 3, and annotations — constitution.congress.gov
- 18 U.S.C. 2381 — law.cornell.edu
- Haupt v. United States, 330 U.S. 631 (1947); Kawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952).
- Carlton F.W. Larson, "The Forgotten Constitutional Law of Treason and the Enemy Combatant Problem," 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 863 (2006); Larson, On Treason (2020); Civics 101 interview
- Cramer v. United States, 325 U.S. 1 (1945).
- U.S. Constitution, Amend. XIV, Sec. 3; Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024) — supremecourt.gov
- 18 U.S.C. 371; DOJ Criminal Resource Manual 923 — justice.gov
- 18 U.S.C. 951; 22 U.S.C. 611 et seq. — justice.gov
- "Statement by Former Federal Prosecutors," Protect Democracy, May 6, 2019.
- 18 U.S.C. 1512, 201, 3282; U.S. Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 9, cl. 8; Fischer v. United States, 603 U.S. 480 (2024).
- Just Security, on U.S. v. Trump, S.D. Fla. No. 9:23-cr-80101, dismissed July 15, 2024.
- Office of Legal Counsel, "A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution," 24 Op. O.L.C. 222 (Oct. 16, 2000) — justice.gov
- Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024) — justia.com; Lawfare on footnote 3
- U.S. Constitution, Art. II, Sec. 4; Art. I, Sec. 3, cls. 6–7 — law.cornell.edu
- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 65 — founders.archives.gov
- Max Farrand, ed., The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, Vol. 2 (debates of July 20, 1787).
- U.S. Senate roll call votes, Feb. 5, 2020 and Feb. 13, 2021.
- U.S. Constitution, Amend. XXV, Sec. 4; CRS — everycrsreport.com
- National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, Pub. L. 118-31, Sec. 1250A, 22 U.S.C. 1928f — govinfo.gov; CRS R48868 (Feb. 27, 2026)
- RFE/RL, on the canceled Budapest summit and Rosneft/Lukoil sanctions, Oct. 22, 2025.
- Al Jazeera, on the Oct. 9, 2026 Trump–Putin call, Oct. 10, 2026.
- North Atlantic Treaty, Art. 5 — nato.int
- Slate, on Trump's Aug. 16, 2026 Truth Social post on the South Korea drills — slate.com; Stars and Stripes, Aug. 18, 2026 — stripes.com
- PBS NewsHour, "Trump lashes out at South Korea over its refusal to join Iran war," Aug. 17, 2026 — pbs.org
- Al Jazeera (Reuters), "Trump calls Kim Jong Un a 'friend' and plays down N Korea's nuclear arsenal," Sept. 30, 2026 — aljazeera.com
Updates and corrections
No corrections as of publication.
FMNN takes no advertising or investor money. Our reporting is funded by merchandise and book sales. Learn how we're funded